Recent Posts

In Atlanta through Friday

Off to visit the Chimps this week in Atlanta. Blogging from me may be light, but Steve will be around.

We're gonna party like it's 1996!

Over on deliverability.com Dela Quist has a long blog post up talking about how changes to Hotmail and Gmail’s priority inbox are a class action suit waiting to happen.
All I can say is that it’s all been tried before. Cyberpromotions v. AOL started the ball rolling when they tried to use the First Amendment to force AOL to accept their unsolicited email. The courts said No.
Time goes on and things change. No one argues Sanford wasn’t spamming, he even admitted as much in his court documents. He was attempting to force AOL to accept his unsolicited commercial email for their users. Dela’s arguments center around solicited mail, though.
Do I really think that minor difference in terminology going to change things?
No.
First off “solicited” has a very squishy meaning when looking at any company, particularly large national brands. “We bought a list” and “This person made a purchase from us” are more common than any email marketer wants to admit to. Buying, selling and assuming permission are par for the course in the “legitimate” email marketing world. Just because the marketer tells me that I solicited their email does not actually mean I solicited their email.
Secondly, email marketers don’t get to dictate what recipients do and do not want. Do ISPs occasionally make boneheaded filtering decisions? I’d be a fool to say no. But more often than not when an ISP blocks your mail or filters it into the bulk folder they are doing it because the recipients don’t want that mail and don’t care that it’s in the bulk folder. Sorry, much of the incredibly important marketing mail isn’t actually that important to the recipient.
Dela mentions things like bank statements and bills. Does he really think that recipients are too stupid to add the from address to their address books? Or create specific filters so they can get the mail they want? People do this regularly and if they really want mail they have the tools, provided by the ISP, to make the mail they want get to where they want it.
Finally, there is this little law that protects ISPs. 47 USC 230 states:

Gmail Evolution

All the cool kids are doing infographics, so here’s our take on the new Gmail Priority Inbox.

Spammers quickly adopting social media

Spammers have already discovered they can send spam through Apple’s new Ping service. Yes, some of the fastest adopters of new technology are spammers.
Isn’t technology wonderful?

The cult of SPF lives

Years ago, prior to the public discussions of Domain Keys, there was SPF as the solution to all our email authentication problems. SPF was going to let people do all sorts of things with email. The proponents even privately asserted that it would solve the spam problem. In essence, SPF was a cult. BoF sessions at meetings had the flavor of a big tent style revival. Those of us who didn’t support SPF were shunned and belittled. How could we not support such a brilliant protocol? Did we want spam to continue being a problem? All our objections no matter how rooted in reality were dismissed out of hand. SPF was an evangelical, cult-like movement.
I am somewhat sad to announce that the cult of SPF still lives. The most recent example is the number of people that have taken me to task for a recent post I wrote pointing out that SPF records aren’t actually that important for email delivery. My example was that a client of mine had incorrect SPF records (with a -all even) but was still getting inbox delivery at Hotmail. We repaired the records, re-registered them with Hotmail and Hotmail not only isn’t checking them but also sent mail to me admitting they don’t check SPF for incoming email.
My statement was that SPF wasn’t really important to getting email delivered. This seems to have upset a number of people. Someone on twitter pointed out that a valid SPF record gave you a positive score with SpamAssassin. What they didn’t mention was that a valid SPF record gives you an entire -0.001 with SpamAssassin.
Today I get a comment from Tom (which seems more like an ad for his company than an actual comment) that says

Email marketing is hard

I’ve watched a couple discussions around the email and anti-spam community recently with a bit of awe. It seems many email marketers are admitting they are powerless to actually implement all the good advice they give to others.
They are admitting they can’t persuade, cajole, influence or pressure their companies to actually follow best practices. Some of the comments public and private comments I’ve heard from various industry leaders:

The first edition of the Magill Report dropped in my mailbox (and the mailboxes of lots of other people judged by my twitter feed) this afternoon. In his newsletter, tucked between an announcement of a new DMA CEO and rather depressing news about how long it’s taking to find jobs, he announced that Goodmail is being offered for sale. It seems that an investment banking firm is offering a company it calls “Project Conduit.”

Social Networks and Email

There’s been a steady trickle of “Email is Dead!” announcements over the years.
2005 – Pew Internet announces “email may be at the beginning of a slow decline”
2006 – USA Today announces “Email has become the new snail-mail”
2009 – The Wall Street Journal announces “The End of the Email Era”.
That’s not surprising, and it’s due to the importance of email – in the same way that most high-end smartphones have to be pitched as “iPhone killers”, no new communication channel will get any respect unless it’s pitched to the blogosphere (and the venture capitalists) as an “email killer”.
That claim has been debunked lots of times. Repeatedly. Many, many times. More times than that.
But sometimes you need something to make you notice quite how alive email is. I signed up for a Facebook account about three years ago, and had half forgotten about it. After a couple of people mentioned it at a pool party on Saturday, I added three friends yesterday.
This is what my mailbox looks like today (with a couple of private mailing lists blanked out):

Email is looking quite healthy.
If anything does ever kill it, I’m betting it won’t be social networking.

Recent Posts

In Atlanta through Friday

We're gonna party like it's 1996!

Gmail Evolution

Spammers quickly adopting social media

The cult of SPF lives

Email marketing is hard

Gmail and SenderScore

Botnets and viruses and phishing, oh my!

Goodmail for sale?

Social Networks and Email

Categories

Tags