Recent Posts

Guaranteed email delivery

Ben over at Mailchimp has a good post about his response (and his support staff’s more professional and helpful response) to inquires asking if Mailchimp can guarantee an improvement in delivery.
I sympathize with Ben, and commend his staff. I often get potential clients asking me if I can guarantee I can get their mail to the inbox or get them off a public or private blocklist. And, the answer really is no, I can’t guarantee anything. Much of delivery is solely in the hands of the actual sender. Sure, ESPs can enforce a certain standard of behaviour and they can do all the technical things right. And consultants like me can tell you how ISP spam filters work and explain how some of your choices and processes affect delivery. But none of us can guarantee inbox delivery.
Only one company has tried to guarantee inbox delivery, and they shut down earlier this year because they were non-viable and couldn’t get enough of a recipient userbase to attract customers.
For the rest of us, though, the best we can do is give senders the tools and information they need to succeed in getting mail delivered to the inbox.

Evangelizing Permission

Last week the Only Influencers email discussion group tackled this question posed by Ken Magill.

Permission-ish based marketing

My Mum flew in to visit last week, and over dinner one evening the talk turned to email.

Spammers and the law

Robert Soloway, one of the people crowned with the title “Spam King”, has been released from jail. He was an extremely prolific spammer, generating over 10 trillion messages over the course of his career.
As Mr. Soloway exits jail, another spammer heads to serve his 20 year sentence. Peter Maxson Anyanyueze sent Nigerian 419 spams telling people they could profit from helping him move money around. The scam is that the victim needs to pay small amounts of money, sometimes totalling tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars.

No false-starts, do-overs, or mulligans for Email

Guest post by Neil Schwartzman
Josh Baer, former VP of Datran Media and current CEO of OtherInBox.com has been floating an idea at the DMA’s Email Experience Council and a few other places, and recently got some traction in Ken Magill’s Magill Report.
What Josh is proposing is to create the technical means by which a Sender can decide when email ‘expires’ and is automatically removed from a recipient’s inbox, either by deletion, or perhaps archiving (in the case of Gmail). This would supposedly help the end-user, by removing marketing offers that are no longer available.

Expiring emails

J.D. Falk posts over on the Return Path blog about the new proposed standard for expiring email. It’s an interesting concept, but like J.D. I don’t see it going very far.

Phishing protection

Last week Return Path announced a new service: Domain Assurance. This service allows companies who send only authenticated email to protect their brand from phishing attacks. Participating ISPs will reject unauthenticated email from domains participating in this program.

Blocklist BCP

As many of you may be aware there is a draft document working its way through the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) discussing best common practices for blocklists. The IRTF is a parallel organization to the IETF and is charged with long term research related to the Internet. The Anti-Spam Working Group was chartered to investigate tools and techniques for dealing with spam.
Recently the ASRG posted a draft of a best practices document aimed at those running blocklists (draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-07). This document has been under development for many years. The authors have used this document to share their experiences with running blocklists and their knowledge of what works and what doesn’t.
Best practices documents are never easy to write and consensus can be difficult. But I think that the authors did a good job capturing what the best practices are for blocklists. I do support the document in principle and, in fact, support many of the specific statements and practices outlined there. As with any best practices documents it’s not perfect but overall it reflects the current best practices for blocklists.
Ken Magill’s article about the BCP
Anti-Abuse buzz article about the BCP

Back from MAAWG

Today is the first day back at work after a productive MAAWG conference.
The thing I get most out of MAAWG is a greater appreciation for what a large, global force messaging is. The recent protests and uprisings around the world have relied on messaging to organize, share information and communicate. Messaging is also somewhat fragile. Thing things that make it great for strangers to interact with one another also allows bad people and organizations to cause harm.
It is a struggle to minimize the harm while not hurting the good.
MAAWG is comprised of the people that make messaging work. These are folks that are on the front lines in the fight to stop online harm. It’s somewhat humbling to watch a conference full of really smart people, from all levels of responsibility, discuss ways to improve messaging for real users and real people while stopping the bad people. There are good ideas and bad ideas, but discussions are professional and informative. Plus it’s always good to see old friends and make new ones.
I inevitably come back from MAAWG with a load of things to do, new projects to take on and new ideas. This time I’m also looking forward to the publication of a document announced at the conference. The EastWest Institute’s Chief Technology Officer Karl Frederick Rauscher talked about a report they will be publishing next month talking about how China and the US are working together to fight spam.

Marketing on Facebook

An interesting look at what doesn’t work when marketing on Facebook.