Recent Posts

Canada publishes updated proposed regulations for CASL

Based on initial feedback collected in 2011, updated regulations for CASL have been published by the Industry Canada. Interested stakeholders have until February 4, 2013 to comment on the proposed regulations.
Edit: to identify correct Canadian Govt Agency (Thanks, Neil!)

Increasing engagement for delivery?

I’ve talked a lot about engagement here over the years and how increasing engagement can increase inbox delivery.
But does driving engagement always improve delivery?

Take LinkedIn as an example. LinkedIn has started to pop-up a link when users log in. This popup suggests that the user endorse a connection for a particular skill. When the user clicks on the popup, an email is sent to the connection. The endorsement encourages the recipient to visit the LinkedIn website and review endorsements. Once the user is on the site, they receive a popup asking for endorsement of a connection. Drives engagement both on the website and with email. Win for everyone, right?
I get lots of these endorsements, but I’ve had a few that have made me wonder what’s really going on. Are these people really endorsing my skills? If they are then why am I getting endorsements from people I’ve not seen in 15 years and why are some of the endorsed skills things I can’t do?
This morning I asked one of my connections if he really did endorse me for my abilities in Cloud Computing. His response was enlightening.

Images in the subject line

I’ve seen this trick used by a few senders recently, with varying effectiveness.

Where do they get these pictures?
While you can scatter any images you like across the body of your message, the subject line is limited to just text. But “text” is more than just “a, b, c” – using RFC 2047 encoding you can use any character you like, including many tiny pictures.
⛄ 💰 🐘 ✈ 🎁 ☂
☀|||||||☀
Experian, Vertical Response and Bronto all have some interesting things to say about the effectiveness of using these.
Finding the right glyph can be tricky. Macs have a fairly decent glyph search engine (under Edit > Special Characters… in most applications) while Windows has a fairly mediocre one (Start > All Programs > Accessories > System Tools > Character Map > Advanced View). Both are missing some useful features, though, so I put together something better.
emailstuff.org/glyph lets you search for glyphs by name. It’ll tell you about related glyphs (“helicopter” and “airplane”, or “package” and “wrapped present”) which can help you find the right image when you don’t know it’s name. And, once you’ve chosen a glyph, it shows how to use it in various encodings (if you’re using a GUI tool or a web form to compose your emails you can probably just copy and paste, but it’s handy for manually editing messages when your composition tool isn’t unicode-friendly).
Will all your recipients be able to see these glyphs? All mail clients support utf-8 text and this sort of encoding so the only issue is whether the recipient has a font installed with the glyph in it. That’s operating system specific, rather than depending on the web browser or mail client, so if you want to test – and you probably should – you can get away with just Windows and OS X for desktop, iOS and Android for mobile.
Have fun! But don’t overdo it.

Meaningless metrics

I’ve been having some conversations with fellow delivery folks about metrics and delivery and bad practices. Sometimes, a sender will have what appear to be good metrics, but really aren’t getting them through any good practices. They’re managing to avoid the clear indicators of bad practices (complaints, SBL listings, blocks, etc), but only because the metrics aren’t good.
This made me laugh when a friend posted a link to a Business Insider article about how many website metrics aren’t useful indicators of the business value of a website. Then I found the original blog post referenced in the article: Bullshit Metrics. It’s a great post, you should go read it.
I’d say the concluding paragraph has as much relevance to email marketing as to web marketing.

Hotmail issues

A number of people, both at ESPs and on the mailops mailing list, are reporting problems at Hotmail. The most common reports are senders getting

Winding down for the holidays

I’m frantically trying to get a couple client projects finished before next week so blogging will probably be light until the New Year.

Phones part of SMS botnet

Spammers have been moving into the phone market for a long time. Just recently security firms have discovered an Android botnet. This botnet sends viruses over SMS, and when a link in the SMS is clicked, the phone is infected with the virus which then sends more SMS.
The technology for blocking and reporting SMS spam is comparable to email blocking technology 10 or 12 years ago. There just aren’t many tools for people to use to control this spam. M³AAWG is addressing mobile spam, but it still seems that the volumes are increasing without much recourse. Even the 7726 reporting number doesn’t seem to stop the spam (nor remove per-text charges).
At least in the beginning of the email spam problem, we didn’t have botnets. Now, at the beginning of the curve for SMS spam, we already have self replicating botnets. I’m afraid the good guys might be behind on this issue.
Then again I might just be cranky because SMS spammers woke us up at 4:30 am.
Infoworld article
TNW article
PCWorld article

Penkava v. Yahoo: dismissed

Carson Penkava, who was suing Yahoo! under California wiretapping laws, filed for dismissal with prejudice at the end of November. No reasons were given.

Volume! Volume! Volume!

Saw a series of tweets this morning from random consumers about holiday marketing volume.

There is no bat phone

I don’t have much to add to Al’s post about the lack of people to call at different ISPs to get mail delivered. I will say there was a time some ISPs had staff that would deal with senders and blocking problems. But those positions have gradually been eliminated over the last 2 or 3 years. In some cases the employees left for greener pastures, in others they were subject to layoffs and budget cuts. In most cases, though, the employees were not replaced.
ISPs have moved to complex and multi-tired spam filtering. They’ve removed the ability of most employees to actually interrupt the filtering and special case a sender. Getting mail delivered is about sending mail that recipients want. It’s not about who you know. It’s about how much recipients like your mail.