Ask Laura: Is the SmartScreen Filter Really Smart?

AskLaura_Heading3

Dear Laura,
Can you help me understand the Microsoft SmartScreen filter? I’m working on a new project and we’re not able to get to the inbox at Microsoft. 
Our SNDS/JMRP health is great, not a problem that we can see, but when we contact the support team we’re told we’re being flagged by SmartScreen. It seems impossible to try and find any information or ways to rectify this issue. We’re not blacklisted, and our deliverability and open rates with other providers is generally solid. Any ideas?
Signed, Is SmartScreen actually Smart?

Dear Signed,
SmartScreen is a proprietary Microsoft measurement for email. The SmartScreen filter is based on a number of things Microsoft collects from their users. Like many mail providers, Microsoft looks at how users interact with mail, including deleting without reading, moving to the spam folder, moving from the spam folder, saving, and marking as spam. In addition to these standard metrics, Microsoft also directly asks users their opinion on mail.
The Microsoft panel is different than many other filtering technologies, and is worth spending a little time discussing. Microsoft selects users of any of their different webmail systems at random and invites them to be part of their panel. After users agree to be on the panel, some of the mail they are receiving is presented to them in a special window. The users are asked if this is spam or not spam.
There are a couple things to remember about the Microsoft Panel data.

  • Panelists are chosen at random.
  • Panelists are only asked about mail that is addressed to them.
  • Microsoft considers this data more accurate than other measurements.
  • ReturnPath customers can get a glimpse into the panel data, but otherwise this is not shared.

If you’re being told by support that it’s a SmartScreen flag, then the underlying problem is your reputation. Recipients are directly telling Microsoft that they don’t like your mail and there are other negative impacts from the subscribers.
Getting out of SmartScreen filters can be a significant challenge for senders. The underlying issue, as with many deliverability issue, is the recipients. My most successful clients have temporarily purged their lists down to just very engaged recipients. Once mail was going to the inbox, they made decisions about which users to add back to the mail stream and then did so.
Overall, if you’re seeing problems with SmartScreen, the solution is to go back to the beginning and look at your permission and data collection practices.
laura

When we work with brands and senders to improve email delivery, there are many questions that come up again and again. For 2016, we thought it might be interesting to answer some of those questions here on the blog so others can benefit from the information.
Confused about delivery in general? Trying to keep up on changing policies and terminology? Need some Email 101 basics? This is the place to ask. We can’t answer specific questions about your server configuration or look at your message structure for the column (please get in touch if you’d like our help with more technical or forensic investigations!), but we’d love to answer your questions about how email works, trends in the industry, or the joys and challenges of cohabiting with felines.

Related Posts

Changes at Hotmail

Microsoft announced a number of changes to the Hotmail interface today. It doesn’t look like this will affect how mail is received, but will affect how users can interact with it.
As always, the best advice I can give you is send mail people want and like.

Read More

Email predictions for 2015

Welcome to a whole new year. It seems the changing of the year brings out people predicting what they think will happen in the coming year. It’s something I’ve indulged in a couple times over my years of blogging, but email is a generally stable technology and it’s kind of boring to predict a new interface or a minor tweak to filters. Of course, many bloggers will go way out on a limb and predict the death of email, but I think that’s been way over done.
ChangeConstant
Even major technical advancements, like authentication protocols and the rise of IPv6, are not usually sudden. They’re discussed and refined through the IETF process. While some of these changes may seem “all of a sudden” to some end users, they’re usually the result of years of work from dedicated volunteers. The internet really doesn’t do flag days.
One major change in 2014, that had significant implications for email as a whole, was a free mail provider abruptly publishing a DMARC p=reject policy. This caused a lot of issues for some small business senders and for many individual users. Mailing list maintainers are still dealing with some of the fallout, and there are ongoing discussions about how best to mitigate the problems DMARC causes non-commercial email.
Still, DMARC as a protocol has been in development for a few years. A number of large brands and commercial organizations were publishing p=reject policies. The big mail providers were implementing DMARC checking, and rejection, on their inbound mail. In fact, this rollout is one of the reasons that the publishing of p=reject was a problem. With the flip of a switch, mail that was once deliverable became undeliverable.
Looking back through any of the 2014 predictions, I don’t think anyone predicted that two major mailbox providers would implement p=reject policies, causing widespread delivery failures across the Internet. I certainly wouldn’t have predicted it, all of my discussions with people about DMARC centered around business using DMARC to protect their brand. No one mentioned ISPs using it to force their customers away from 3rd party services and discussion lists.
I think the only constant in the world of email is change, and most of the time that change isn’t that massive or sudden, 2014 and the DMARC upheaval notwithstanding.
But, still, I have some thoughts on what might happen in the coming year. Mostly more of the same as we’ve seen over the last few years. But there are a couple areas I think we’ll see some progress made.

Read More

Hotmail having a bad day

Looks like Hotmail / Microsoft is having a rather bad day. Their DNS seems to be intermittent. While they were down a while ago they were returning SERVFAIL for some DNS lookups, including MX lookups.
For senders who have the DNS data in their recursive resolvers, this will have no impact. For senders who either don’t have the data cached or who have the data expire before the servers come back online there may be a transient increase in the number of bounces at Microsoft domains (Hotmail, Outlook, MSN.com, office365.com and the Microsoft corporate domains including microsoft.com and their other domains like xboxone.com).
 
 

Read More