Ask Laura: Does changing ESPs hurt deliverability?

AskLaura_Heading3
 

Dear Laura,
We’re a small ESP and as we onboard new clients, we often hear them ask “Why did I get better open rates with our previous provider? There has to be something wrong with your platform!”
As part of the onboarding process, we meet with new clients to provide best practices and let them know they are building a reputation with ISPs on new IPs. We talk about how algorithms are constantly changing (one thing that worked yesterday might not work today) and I ask them to provide me the metrics so I can see for myself. In some cases, the metrics reveal that there is no issue, while in others, we do have lower rates.
How should I address this, in both cases?
Math is Hard

Dear Math,
I get this question a lot, too, from our clients who have made ESP changes.
My answer is usually that I don’t know how their previous company calculated their open rate (total sent? total sent minus bounces? total sent minus bounces corrected for inbox?) so they may not be measuring the same thing. I then go on to talk about other metrics: are they seeing similar patterns with click throughs and actions? Has revenue dropped?
I also talk a lot about how even seemingly minor changes in content and structure can change delivery. In many cases companies take changing ISPs as a chance to overhaul their sending program. This means lots of changes, from domains to layout and content through to subscriber additions. These all add up and can change open rates, too.
In general, I think it would serve you and other ESPs to be proactive in setting expectations with new clients that it is likely and normal that they will see fluctuations in engagement metrics as they move on to a new platform, and that you expect these rates to stabilize over the next few months.
Good luck!
Laura

 
Confused about delivery in general? Trying to keep up on changing policies and terminology? Need some Email 101 basics? This is the place to ask. We can’t answer specific questions about your server configuration or look at your message structure for the column (please get in touch if you’d like our help with more technical or forensic investigations!), but we’d love to answer your questions about how email works, trends in the industry, or the joys and challenges of cohabiting with felines.
 

Related Posts

Gmail opens… anyone seeing changes?

I’m wondering if people are seeing any changes in open rates now that gmail defaulted to on.
Anyone got any quick feedback?

Read More

When an open is not a sign of interest

A lot of people, including myself, are using opens as one of the measures of engagement. This, as a general rule, is not a bad measure. However, there are people who will open email not because they’re interested in it, but because they know it is spam.
Take, for instance, the email address I acquired in 1993. Yes, I still have this address. I stopped using it to sign up for lists in 1999 and stopped using it for most of the rest of my mail around 2001. This address, though, is on any number of spam mailing lists. The spam that gets through is usually sent by hard-core spammers. The ISP that hosts that mailbox uses Communigate Pro to filter mail, so much of the casual spam is filtered.
Generally, if I open an email (and load images or click through) on that account it is only in order to track down a spammer. For instance, I’m getting a lot of spam there from affiliates offering me the opportunity to purchase printing services for a very low price. I have actually been opening the mail, and clicking through. But I’m not clicking through because I’m interested in purchasing. I’m clicking through to see if my reports to abuse@ printer are resulting in any action against the spammers. (They’re not).
The thing is, though, I know that by clicking through on ads, I’ve now been promoted by the spammer to the “clicks on emails! it’s a live address!” list. Which only means I’m going to get more spam from them. Lucky me.
Using clicks and opens as a measure of engagement isn’t necessarily bad. But when using them you have to understand the limitations of the measurement and that what you may think it’s telling you isn’t actually what it’s telling you.

Read More

Standardizing email metrics

Slogging towards e-mail metrics standardization a report by Direct Mag on the efforts of the Email Experience Council to standardize definitions related to email marketing.

Read More