Yahoo Mail Deliverability FAQ Updated

Yahoo has updated their FAQ and listed out a number of factors they use to determine if a mail message is spam.

  • IP Address Reputation
  • URL Reputation
  • Domain Reputation
  • Sender Reputation
  • DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) signatures
  • DMARC authentication
  • Autonomous System Number (ASN) reputation

Autonomous System Number (ASN) is a globally unique number that is assigned to a group of IP networks operated by one or more network operators. Think of an ASN as having a unique number assigned to your neighborhood.  Your neighborhood would build a reputation based on the people who live there and what types of emails they send.
Even with positive sending history, users can still mark your messages as spam and that will affect your reputation too.  The key is to only send relevant mail to users who have opted-in and want that mail.
Yahoo also includes a number of actions senders can take to improve their delivery:

  1. Utilize the Yahoo Complaint Feedback Loop to automatically unsubscribe users who have marked your message as spam.
  2. Use separate IP addresses and mail streams for different type of content.
  3. Sign with DKIM. DKIM defines who is responsible for sending the message and has reputation tied to the DKIM domain.
  4. Be consistent with your mailings and watch for throttling.
  5. Don’t ignore the subject line. Email subject lines are important because users will make a decision based on them and if messages are being deleted without being read, that will hurt your sending reputation.
  6. Make sure you have PTR records setup for your sending IP addresses.

If your domain is prone to being spoofed, Yahoo does honor your DMARC policy.
h/t to Udeme for the heads up on the updated FAQ page!

Related Posts

Tweets from engagement and deliverability webinar

Want to see some of the tweets shared during the EEC Deliverability and Engagement webinar on March 17? Check out what was said as it happened.

Read More

Updated M3AAWG Best Practices for Senders

M3AAWG has published a new version of the Senders Best Common Practices document and the contains a lot of new information since the original publication in 2008. The new document covers how to vet ESP customers, considerations when selecting a dedicated or share IP to send mail, and includes best practices on a number of technical processes.
The Senders Best Common Practices document is targeted at deliverability teams and email marketers. Any company that is sending marketing emails, using an Email Service Provider, or provides an email enabled platform, it’s always good to go back and periodically review your system to ensure nothing was missed and to stay up-to-date on all new recommendations.
A few of the recommendations include the use of the List-Unsubscribe header, publishing a clear WHOIS for domains used for sending mail, and how to process non-delivery report messages.
The List-Unsubscribe header provides an additional way for users to opt-out of email messages. Gmail and Outlook.com both use the presence of the list-unsubscribe header to provide a one-click button to allow the user to unsubscribe from the mailing list. Often enough, if a user cannot find an opt-out link, they’re marking the message as spam. Allowing a recipient to unsubscribe easily is critical to maintaining good delivery reputation.
A WHOIS is query to determine who is the registered user or assignee of a domain name. During a session at the most recent M3AAWG meeting, it was announced that spammers throw away 19 million domains per year. When a postmaster or abuse desk receive a complaint, they’ll often query to see who owns the domain the email was sent from or who owns the domains used in the hyperlinks. If the WHOIS record is out of date or set to private, this limits the ability for the postmaster or abuse desk to reach out to the owner of the domain.
Processing non-deliver reports is critical to maintaining a high delivery reputation. Many ESPs have an acceptable-use-policy that includes a bounce rate. Mailjet recommends a bounce rate of less than 8% and Mandrill recommends less than 5%. If a system is not in place to remove the hard bounces from your mailing list, the sender’s reputation will quickly deteriorate.
The Senders Best Common Practices document can be downloaded at M3AAWG.org.
 

Read More

Engagement, ISPs and the EEC

There’s been some controversy over some of the things said by the ISPs at the recent EEC meeting. Different people interpret what was said by the ISPs in different ways. The EEC has set up a webinar for March 17 to clarify and explain what was meant by the ISPs.

Read More