Don't like opt-outs? Target your program better.

I get a LOT of spam here. Most of it is marked and trivial to get rid of. Some of it is what I would call semi-legitimate. It’s a real product, but I never asked to receive any information from this company and am not actually part of their demographic. For one time things I just hit delete and move on. Life is too short to complain or opt out of every spam I get. (Tried that, got more mail)
But sometimes if the same sender keeps bothering me, I will send back an email asking them to cease contact. I recently had an occasion where someone sent an initial email trying to sell me bulk SMS, online video and other services. I ignored it because we’re not in the market for any of these services. A week later I get a followup asking why I hadn’t provided feedback to them and if there was a better person to talk to at the company. I looked for a way to opt-out of this message stream, but there wasn’t one. I send a reply telling them we were not interested in speaking to them and to please cease all communication. (“You didn’t receive feedback because I have no interest in talking to you. Please cease all future contact.” Admittedly that was terse, but it was polite.)
My request to cease communication was not well received, nor was it honored. Mind you, they first contacted me trying to sell me services that are totally off what we offer. When I asked them not to contact me, they turned it around that we’d lost business.

Dear Laura,
Thank you very much for such a kind email, so nice from you…
We are using ESP1 and ESP2 at the moment, I was also interested to see which Emailer will have the best approach to may be switch to them, it will definitely won’t be wordtothewise.com. We prefer to work with happy people.
A word to the wise, However…
Best Regards,

(Neither ESP mentioned was involved in sending this email, hence the edits.)
This is just so not the way to respond to a request to stop mailing someone. It was an un-targeted, cold email sent to a business address with no way to opt-out. Of course some people are going to ask you not to continue talking to them, and you stop contacting them and move on.
Even the DMA recommends letting people go if they don’t like your offer.

“We call it the ‘one bite at the apple’ rule,” [Patricia Faley of the Direct Marketing Association] says. “Give me one chance to show you what I have to offer you, and if you don’t like it, then I won’t contact you again.” Congress has hard time stomaching e-mail spam

I suspect, though, that the oh-so-friendly general manager who sent me the above email is having a hard time with his mail and his delivery. These cold emails are going out through a shared ISP server and are unauthenticated. Their targeting is horrible, and nothing we do makes us a viable target for their product. I suspect between those two things, they’re seeing a poor response to this marketing program. I can just imagine a very excited staff, that their followup email got a response and they open it to find… an unsubscribe request. In a fit of disappointment, they sent off an poorly considered email in reply.
It’s hard to put time and energy and money into a failed marketing program. I am sympathetic to the above company, who is struggling so hard to market through email that they can’t graciously accept opt-out requests. We work every day with clients who are struggling to make sense of why their program isn’t working. If this company was a client I’d recommend a number of things, starting with actually complying with CAN SPAM and including an opt-out link. Then I’d move to fixing their authentication. But the real big fix here is improving their targeting and not wasting their time, or their recipients time, trying to contact folks who are not ever going to buy their product.

Related Posts

Email marketing not dead yet

If Forrester research is to be believe, email marketing is feeling better. In fact, it seems email marketing is more effective than ever.

Read More

The DMA: Email marketing or spam?

A few weeks ago, I signed up for a webinar from the DMA. As is my normal process I used a tagged address. I don’t remember any notification that I would be signing up for mail, and I generally do look for those kinds of things. I also know a lot of webinars are used to drive sales processes and I prefer not to waste sales time if I’m not actually looking to purchase.
In recent weeks I have gotten an ongoing stream of marketing messages from the DMA. I’ve tried to opt-out, but the DMA don’t actually want me to opt-out. Each marketing message is a different type of message from a different list. Each list must be opted out of individually.
First it was Conferences, then it was Education, then it was Awards, then Events. I’m trying to figure out what’s next and how many more times the DMA is going to get to spam me before I just turn that address into a spam trap.
And before you tell me that I can’t make an address a spam trap, think about that a little bit. I never opted this mail in to receive anything but the webinar confirmation. I’ve dutifully opted out each and every time the DMA has mailed me. I’ve even tried to opt-out of all mail. Unfortunately, the DMA has placed the “opt-out of all mail” behind a registration wall, one I cannot get to as I do not have (or want) a DMA account.
DMASignOn
The DMA is sending me mail I did not request and do not want. They have made it impossible for me to determine how much mail I will get. They have made it difficult for me to opt-out of all their mail.
This is an example of bad email marketing. I’m sure that the DMA will tell me this is all permission based email. I disagree. This is an example of the DMA taking permission. This is not an example of a sender asking for permission. I didn’t give permission to be added to all these DMA lists, and I have no way to actually revoke the permission that they took from me.
I signed up for a second webinar with this email address, one related to CASL. The irony is that the DMA’s behavior here is a violation of a number of points of CASL. First, there was no clear opt-in notice on the website. Second, CASL requires parity between opt-in and opt-out. If I opt-in once then I should be able to opt-out once. CASL puts an end to this opt-in once, opt-out dozens of times process.
I wish I could say I was disappointed in the DMA. But I’m barely surprised. Their track record is poor and they have typically fallen on the side of “I have consent until you force me to acknowledge that I don’t.” In this case, the DMA is demonstrating that quite clearly. They will keep spamming and spamming and spamming. I have no doubt were I to actually register an account, they would continue to spam me with “account notifications” that I was unable to opt-out of because they are transactional, membership messages.

Read More