Marketers, we have a problem

And that problem is security.
Much of what marketing does is build profiles of customers by collecting huge amounts of data on every customer. That data collection is facilitated by compliant customers that provide all sorts of personal data just because they’re politely asked by a retail clerk.
There will always be people who comply with data requests, but I expect more customers to be wary of sharing information at the register.
I’m not the only one, a recent NY Times blog post from one of their security researchers: Stop asking me for my email address. She discusses how much information companies ask for and how complacently consumers hand it over without asking about security.

The point is that no company is secure. None of them. Not when they are up against an increasingly sophisticated, elusive enemy. But the problem is not just retailers, or technology companies or hackers, it’s us.
We regularly hand over data simply because we’re politely asked. We don’t read privacy policies, or ask companies whether our email addresses and passwords will be “salted” or “hashed,” encrypted with long or short keys, or whether those keys will be stored on separate systems from the ones they can unscramble.

The underlying problem is that marketers and the companies they work for, are not taking security seriously enough. The collection of reams and reams of personal data, from PII through to email opens and clicks, makes this data a prime target for criminals.
It concerns me that security breaches are getting bigger and taking more data and affecting companies with large customer bases.
Security has to become a bigger priority for companies.

Spamtraps, again.
Welcome to our new site

Related Posts

When did you check your security last?

A few years ago security and breach protection was all the topic of the day in the email space. There were some high profile break ins at ESPs and data companies and everyone was looking at their security. Companies were vocal and public about their security enhancements. Many in the email industry even used the term “advanced persistent threats.”
Security seems to have taken a back seat to Yahoo releasing user names, and Gmail introducing tabs in the inbox and all the myriad of tiny details that we feel we have some control over.
But security still should be at the forefront of our minds. Just today Adobe announced a major compromise resulting in both a customer information leak and a source code theft.
It serves as a reminder to all of us that security threats are ongoing and we cannot become complacent.

Read More

Is your data secure?

Not just secure from outside forces, but also secure from employees?
In a recent survey published by Help Net Security, approximately half of all employees said they would take data, including customer data, when leaving a job.
This has major implications for ESPs, where employees have access to customer data and mailing lists. There are at least 2 cases that I am aware of where employees have walked out of a company with customer mailing lists, and I’m sure there are other incidents.
ESPs should take action to prevent employees from stealing customer data.

Read More

Lavabit and darkmail

The M3AAWG keynote address today was a talk from Ladar Levinson about the shut down of Lavabit mail service after receiving demands from the NSA to hand over their SSL keys.
@maawg tweeted different quotes from the session. There is a conflict between privacy and security, and these are questions we need to resolve.
Ladar talked about his potential new service called darkmail, which pushes encryption back to the user level. I think there is relevance to this, as many online services are used for political and other organizing. As someone said to me last night, some of the people using our service could be killed if we don’t protect their privacy. He wasn’t speaking of the US residents, but people in places like Ukraine or Arab countries or other places undergoing violent revolutions.
Privacy is important, how we treat privacy is important. Handing over SSL keys to governments strikes me as a big problem.

Read More