Post-mortem on the Spamhaus DOS

There’s been a ton of press over the last week on the denial of service attack on Spamhaus. A lot of it has been overly excited and exaggerated, probably in an effort to generate clicks and ad revenue at the relevant websites. But we’re starting to see the security and network experts talk about the attack, it’s effects and what it tells us about future attacks.
I posted an analysis from the ISC yesterday. They had some useful information about the attack and about what everyone should be doing to stop from contributing to future attacks (close your open DNS resolver). The nice thing about this article is that it looked at the attack from the point of view of network health and security.
Today another article was published in TechWeekEurope that said many of the same things that the ISC article did about the size and impact of the attacks.
What’s the takeaway from this?

  • Yes, there was a very large attack (300Gbps).
  • The attack was focused at Spamhaus, and later some of the Internet Exchanges (IX).
  • The attack caused some sleepless nights for the folks handling the routers as they dealt with the traffic.
  • The attack caused some websites (some hosted by Cloudflare, some sharing network space with Cloudflare) to be offline for some period of time.
  • The attack wasn’t noticed by most end users.
  • The networks identified engineering issues that made this attack worse (open DNS resolvers, some engineering choices inside the IXs).
We’ll get back to email and delivery talk next week. I promise.

Related Posts

Internet Storm Center on the Spamhaus DOS

The Internet Storm Center (ISC) has a blog post up discussing the DOS attack against Spamhaus. They do confirm they saw traffic approaching 300Gbps against Spamhaus. They also point out that most people probably never knew.

Read More

Is Google failing DKIM keys shorter than 512 bits?

Today’s Wednesday question comes from Andrew B. and got pushed to Thursday so I could check a few more facts.

Read More

How long is your DKIM key?

While we were at M3AAWG, Wired published an article talking about how simple it was to crack DKIM keys. I didn’t post about it at the time because it didn’t really seem like news. DKIM keys smaller than 1024 are vulnerable and not secure and the DKIM spec does not recommend using keys smaller than 1024. When I asked the DKIM-people-who-would-know they did tell me that the news was that the keys had been cracked and used in the wild to spoof email.
Fair enough.
If you are signing with DKIM, use a key 1024 or longer. Anything shorter and your risk having the key cracked and your mail fraudulently signed.
This morning M3AAWG published recommendations on keeping DKIM keys secure.

Read More