Internet fraud and private whois records

The Verge has a long article about Internet Marketing and how much fraud is perpetrated by people who label themselves Internet Marketers.
It was interesting, but I didn’t think it was necessarily relevant to email marketers until I saw this quote from Roberto Anguizola at the FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection.

“savvy internet fraudsters use fake information, they use a host of shell companies [and they] use internet registrations that are private or themselves are fraudulent” to cover up their tracks. “If it’s a hydra of an internet scam, and you just chop off one tentacle, you may be missing the rest of it, and it will regenerate in a form that will not be recognizable…”

Then I realized this was worth sharing with my audience. A lot of these scammers use privacy protected domain (internet) registration to hide themselves and cover their tracks.
Who else uses privacy protection? A lot of email marketers. This is happening less and less, but in the last month I had to tell clients to turn off privacy protection before I could contact the ISPs on their behalf.
Many of us who deal in spamblocking, whether it’s troubleshooting and mitigating blocks or instituting blocks, have a very negative gut reaction when we see whois information behind privacy protection.
Now, it’s not that I believe everyone who uses privacy protection has something to hide. Some small business owners use it because they don’t know any better and because their registrar sells them on it. Individuals registering personal domains use privacy protection for very valid reasons. I also know that not every company that uses privacy protection is actually a spammer.
I strongly believe companies should not use privacy protection on any domain they use for business. For domains used in email, this goes double. CAN SPAM requires every email have a postal address. If every email has to have a real address, there is no reason that domains in that mail need to be hidden behind privacy protection.
There are a lot of scammers and spammers who use privacy protection. There are so many of them that a company using privacy protection often gets classified as a scammer or spammer by people handling email, either on the inbound or the outbound. Personally, I’ve had some very bad experiences with clients who use privacy protected domains for their bulk mail. I have not gone so far as to refuse to take them on as clients, but I will no longer contact an ISP, spam filtering company or blocklist for companies that have privacy protected domains. I’m not the only delivery expert that does this.

[Return Path Certified] Program Members must maintain accurate contact information in the whois database and no privacy protection services may be used for all Sender controlled domains that appear in message headers and body text, are used for user sign-up, preference and unsubscribe sites. Return Path Minimum Certification Guide

Scammers, spammers and just plain bad marketers hide their identity behind privacy protection. Using privacy protection makes a company look like them. Don’t be that marketer.

Related Posts

What Happens Next…

or Why All Of This Is Meaningless:
Guest post by Huey Callison
The analysis of the AARP spam was nice, but looking at the Mainsleaze Spammer Playbook, I can make a few educated guesses at what happens next: absolutely nothing of consequence.
AARP, if they acknowledge this publicly (I bet not) has plausible deniability and can say “It wasn’t us, it was an unscrupulous lead-gen contractor”. They probably send a strongly-worded letter to SureClick that says “Don’t do that again”.
SureClick, if they acknowledge this publicly (I bet not) has plausible deniability and can say ‘It wasn’t us, it was an unscrupulous affiliate”. They probably send a strongly-worded letter to OfferWeb that says “Don’t do that again”.
OfferWeb, if they acknowledge this publicly (I bet not) has plausible deniability and can say ‘It wasn’t us, it was an unscrupulous affiliate”. And maybe they DO fire ‘Andrew Talbot’, but that’s not any kind of victory, because he probably already has accounts with OTHER lead-gen outfits, which might even include those who also have AARP as
a client, or a client-of-a-client.
So the best-case result of this analysis being made public is that two strongly-worded letters get sent, the URLs in the spam and the trail of redirects change slightly, but the spam continues at the same volume and with the same results, and AARP continues to benefit from the millions of spams sent on their behalf.
I’m not a lawyer, but I was under the impression that CAN-SPAM imposed liability on the organization that was ultimately responsible for the spam being sent, but until the FTC pursues action against someone like this, or Gevalia, corporations and organizations will continue to get away with supporting, and benefiting from, millions and millions of spams.
As JD pointed out in a comment to a previous post: sorry, AARP, but none of us are going to be able to retire any time soon.

Read More

News and announcements: March 1, 2010

Some news stories and links today.
Spamhaus has announced their new domain block list (DBL). The DBL is a list of domains that have been found in spam.

Read More

Avoiding spammers in affiliate programs

How can companies avoid paying spammers and having their brand associated with spammers?
One of the easiest ways to avoid spam is to not pay for acquisition email. Simply don’t set up an affiliate email marketing program. There are a lot of folks who don’t like me saying that, and who have argued vociferously with me over the years. But email is not a good medium for acquiring new customers if you don’t intend to spam. Email is a great medium for talking with current customers who are engaged with a brand and a company, but currently it is a poor way to acquire customers without spamming.
There are ways companies have successfully used email to acquire customers. There are actually newsletters that contain content but also sell advertising in the newsletter. Look at the newsletters you are receiving, that are relevant to your business space. One example of a newsletter that did this successfully is Magilla Marketing published by DirectMag. Every week there were 4 new articles from Ken Magill, supported by advertising in the newsletter and on the website. These kind of ads will let you reach your target market without spamming.
Now, I know that there are a lot of marketing departments out there that are going to insist that there aren’t useful newsletters or advertising venues for their field and the only way they can acquire customers is to use affiliate programs. I’ve had clients tell me the exact same things. Often they came to me as clients because their own email marketing was blocked by a blocklist or a spam filtering company due to their hiring of spammers. They wanted to police and clean up their affiliate program without having to give it up.
Policing affiliate programs can be done, if the company invests the time and energy into screening the program.
For every company that wants to send email advertising your company ask them to provide information about their company and their email program.

Read More