Gathering data at subscription time

I recently received a survey from my Congressional Representative. She wanted to know what I wanted her to focus on in the coming year. I decided to go ahead and answer the survey, as I have some rather strong opinions on some of the stuff happening in Congress these days.
The email itself was pretty unremarkable, although quite well done. I was as much interested in answering the survey because it’s one of the few emails I’ve seen with an embedded survey.

Screen shot of the email survey in my mailbox
Screenshot of the email survey
I was a little unnerved by the note at the bottom, under the submit button. “By clicking submit you will automatically be opted into receiving regular updates from my e-newsletter.” It’s not necessarily that I mind being opt-ed in, but I get mail from her often enough that I’m pretty sure that I’m already opted in. But, OK, I clicked submit.
I noticed this was being hosted on a website called address-verify.com. OK, so it’s been outsourced to a 3rd party. But what I saw on the website caused me to recoil in horror, both as a email recipient and as an email expert. The “subscription page” doesn’t look like it was intended to be shown to the general public. (Click on the image to see the full form)
Subscription form, not for the public
This appears to be more information than any recipient would give
My first reaction was “You can not seriously expect me to give you all of that data! And why are you asking for my email address, you have it! You sent me email!” Then I started looking at the form a little harder and it actually looks like an internal form used to track constituent contact and not one that was supposed to be exposed to recipients.
I’m sure this is all valuable information for my rep to have, but I’m not going to spend a lot of time filling out the long form. It’s too much to hand over.
I’m disappointed. I actually wanted to give my Rep. the information she was asking for. And I happily answered the survey in the email. I really appreciated the initial email and the subscription notice on the email. It seemed like a well put together campaign and I am happy to give her my feedback. I’m not sure anyone at the office actually looked at the landing page before the email was deployed.
Unfortunately, this is not as uncommon as it should be. Sometimes senders don’t pay attention to landing pages and actually check mails before deploying them, particularly when they’re sending something new. In this case, they lost the chance to engage more with me. And I lost the chance to engage more with them as I just don’t want to spend 20 minutes filling out pages and pages of a survey.

Related Posts

List Attrition

DJ over at Bronto blog has a post up about list churn / list attrition. She quotes a statistic published by Loren from MediaPost (the original post is behind a subscription wall) that a list will lose 30% of their subscribers year over year. This is similar to a statistic that I use, but the context I have seen the published statistic in is slightly different. DJ offers suggestions on how to reduce this churn. All the suggestions are great, but I think that they slightly miss the point. There are multiple processes that can be described as list churn. One is churn DJ addresses, that is people unsubscribe from a mailing list. The other is people abandon their email addresses. Individual mailers have some control over the first type of churn, but almost no control over the second.
I think the study Loren was quoting describes the second phenomenon not the first. In 2002, ReturnPath published a study that showed 31% of people changed email addresses in a single year. Understand, this does not mean that 31% of recipients on any particular list will actively decide to unsubscribe from a list or report it as spam or otherwise unsubscribe from that list. This is 31% of all email address owners will get a new address and abandon their current one. There are a few reasons for the churn.

Read More

Preferences pages

As often as I talk about how badly companies send mail, I think it’s always a good idea to highlight when I find companies doing good things.
Today’s example of a company making me happy is Sur la Table. I’ve been on their mailing list for quite a while and do enjoy the offers and information they send. With the advent of the holiday cooking season, though, they’ve massively increased their volume. 21 emails in September, 25 emails in October and 37 emails in the month of November.

Read More

Choosing Twitter over Email to engage customers

Eric Goldman has an interesting blog post over at hit Technology and Marketing Law blog comparing and contrasting twitter and email. One of the reasons he likes Twitter is that it gives him, the ‘subscriber’ (follower in Twitspeak) control. There’s no chance that the company will sell his data. And, if the company does tweet too much that is uninteresting or irrelevant, the follower can ‘unsubscribe’ (or unfollow) without any fear that the company will override or lose the unsub request.
To my mind, the biggest problem with Twitter for B2C communication is the 140 character limit. On the other hand, it means that companies need to be clear in their language and concise in their tweets. Maybe the limited space is actually a feature not a bug.

Read More