Maine backs away from new marketing restrictions

The WSJ reports that politicians in Maine have figured out that the new Maine law prohibiting collecting information from teenagers without parental permission is badly written and has a lot of problems.
The Attorney General has decided not to enforce the law as it stands. The law does contain private right of action, so there may be private suits filed against companies.
I can’t necessarily fault the state senator who drafted the legislation for her intentions.

The law was drafted by Maine state senator Elizabeth Schneider, who said that she tried to align the legislation in accordance with COPPA. She wanted to expand protection for minors after she attended a national conference on prescription drugs and was shocked to learn about some of the techniques companies use to mine information from adolescents, including giving away toys and iPods in exchange for filling out surveys.
She attributes the bill’s problems to the fact that no one showed up to the public hearing about it, where problematic portions could have been discussed and reworded. “I believed that room would be filled with people in opposition to the bill,” she said. “Nobody turned out in opposition to the legislation.”

Good intentions with the bill, protecting minors from predatory marketers. Whether or not the blame is actually on the people who failed to oppose the bill is not nearly as obvious to me.
HT: @ddayman
==
Don’t forget to participate in the DKIM implementation survey. For ESPs. For ISPs. Check back next week for results.
Here is hoping that the new legislation that Sen. Schneider plans to craft during the next legislative session actually accomplishes her goals.

Related Posts

Supreme Court declines to hear anti-spam case

Yesterday the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal for Virginia v. Jaynes. This means that the Virginia state supreme court ruling overturning the Virginia anti-spam law currently stands.
Jeremy Jaynes was a well known spammer who went under the name Gavin Stubberfield. He was pretty famous in anti-spammer circles for sending horse porn spam. In 2003 he was arrested under the Virginia state anti-spam statute. He was initially convicted but the conviction was overturned on appeal.
Ethan Ackerman has blogged about this case, including a recap today.
Venkat Balasubramani has also blogged about this case.
Mickey Chandler has the docs.
John Levine weighed in.
News Articles: CNN, Washington Post, CNET

Read More

Virginia Court Ruling

John Levine has a insightful review of the recent ruling against the VA anti-spam law.

Read More

Going out of business email strategies

Chad White of Smith-Harmon posted a report today on shutting down email marketing programs when going out of business. He looks in detail at how a number of companies handled their email marketing during the going-out-of-business process. There is a very solid mix of examples of how companies handle things. Some companies do things very badly, like never mention over email that they’re going out of business or neglect to follow CAN SPAM regulations. Others used their list as a communications tool that survived the dissolution of the parent company.
The full report is well worth a read, but the take home messages are clear.

Read More