Going out of business email strategies

Chad White of Smith-Harmon posted a report today on shutting down email marketing programs when going out of business. He looks in detail at how a number of companies handled their email marketing during the going-out-of-business process. There is a very solid mix of examples of how companies handle things. Some companies do things very badly, like never mention over email that they’re going out of business or neglect to follow CAN SPAM regulations. Others used their list as a communications tool that survived the dissolution of the parent company.
The full report is well worth a read, but the take home messages are clear.

First, your email program can play a critical role in alerting your subscribers to changes in operations, winding down operations or liquidation sales.
Oddly, bankrupt retailers usually give anonymous website visitors more information that they give to email subscribers. This is a huge missed opportunity to drive sales, and it’s also disrespectful to your brands’ most loyal customers. The time during which you’re liquidating or exploring your options is a poor time to alienate dedicated subscribers.
And second, and even more importantly, brands that appear to be headed for extinction often find a second life. Examples include the rebirth of Pets.com as a community site run by PetSmart, the takeover of CompUSA.com by TigerDirect parent Systemax, and the rescue of RedEnvelope by new owners. Because of this, maintaining email relationships with your best customers is critical to preserving the value of your brand as much as possible during a transaction.

One thing that was clear to me while I was looking at the report, is that the companies who did things badly weren’t thinking about email marketing as one of their assets during the shutdown process. In one case, the company never even mentioned they were going out of business in their email marketing, the mail just stopped one day. This same company prominently mentioned the going out of business on their website, so it was clearly a failure of the marketing department to communicate over email.
As an aside, Smith-Harmon have their own email marketing program well managed. When I downloaded the report, I agreed to receive email from them. Within 5 minutes of me signing up for the program I received a welcome message welcoming me to the program, giving me some real content and not relying on images. Kudos to them for walking the walk.

Related Posts

Disposable or Temporary Addresses

Mark Brownlow has a really good post up today about disposable and temporary addresses and how they affect marketers trying to build an opt-in list.
I use tagged addresses for all my signups, and have for more than 10 years now. It lets me track who I gave an address to and if this mail is contrary to what I signed up for or the address has leaked, I can shut down mail to that address entirely.
Tagged addresses also have another function. One of our local brew pubs has a rewards program, spend money there, get points. As part of the signup process, they requested an email address. All the email I have received from them has been clearly branded, well designed, they are an example of how to use email right. That is until last week. Last week I received an email to the tagged address from some survey company. The survey company provided no branding, nothing.

Read More

Subscribers notice what marketers do

Stephanie Miller from RP blogs at EEC about a UK consumer survey with the take home message: “consumers notice what email marketers do. When we send something interesting and relevant at a good pace, they are happy to stay active with our programs. When we don’t… well, then we’ve lost them, perhaps for good.”

Read More

Confirmed opt-in

I spent the morning in multiple venues correcting mis-understandings of confirmed opt-in. The misunderstandings weren’t so much that people didn’t understand how COI works, but more they didn’t understand all the implications.
In one venue, the conversation centered around how small a portion of deliverability the initial subscription process affects. Sure, sending unwanted, unexpected email can and does cause reputation problems, but merely using COI as a subscription methodolgy doesn’t automatically give a sender a good reputation or good delivery. Senders using COI as a subscription practice need to also need to send relevant and engaging mail that their recipients expect to receive. They need to handle their bounces well and purge or re-engage inactive subscribers. They need to keep their complaints low and their responses high.
How you manage subscriptions is only one factor in reputation schemes, and even if the subscription method is COI other factors can negate any bonus involved.
The second conversation involved Ken challenging me on the comment I left on his quiz yesterday. I said COI wasn’t foolproof and he challenged me to explain how. I did, and he’ll be following up next week.

Read More